Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shri Dattatreya Akhara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Courcelles 00:45, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Shri Dattatreya Akhara

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable  Boolyme बूलीमी   Chat बोलो!! 16:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete notability is not proved. No cite source, could not find any significant coverage. »  nafSadh did say 17:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  01:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I found two references in Google Books, and there is a very strong presumption that reliable sources exist in other languages. Cullen328 (talk) 02:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Searching regular Google for the exact phrase "Dattatreya Akhara" returned only 450 or so hits and the Hindi "दत्तात्रेय अखाड़ा" barely over 200. I was throughly unimpressed with the English material pulling up; while the existence of this Hindu monastery is confirmed, that's pretty much about it. My own sentiment is to have an extremely low bar for monasteries much like we have a low bar for religious training institutions. I can absolutely appreciate the contrary view that there are few if any substantial sources out there about the monastery itself, at least in English. Still, in my opinion this should be accorded the same sort of treatment which we accord religious seminaries in the West — which is to say, a low notability bar as a school. Carrite (talk) 14:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree with Cullen and Carrite above. Enough information to establish notability, however, article needs to be properly referenced.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 22:11, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 03:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.