Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shri Mangalnath Maharaj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 11:34, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Shri Mangalnath Maharaj

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a hagiography of some sort--or, assuming that the person is still living (hard to figure out since it's completely unreferenced), a promotional piece. A kind of reference appears to be given but it is so incomplete that it's impossible to judge if and what that source actually says, and if that is reliable or not. Google delivers nothing but the usual forums and Facebook pages. Drmies (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Effectively unreferenced article, heavy with POV. I'm not finding any WP:RS evidence of notability. (Happy to change that view if someone locates convincing references in a non-Latin script, of course.) AllyD (talk) 22:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as per AllyD. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as Notability cant established, looks like promotional article. Not referenced which was created in 2009.--Nizil (talk) 19:09, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not seem to meet WP:ANYBIO whether they're alive or dead. Definitely troubling with no WP:RS and no apparent ones after a quick search. Most of the article is about his teachings but does not come close to WP:ACADEMIC or WP:AUTHOR. Mkdw talk 01:01, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.