Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrill Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Shrill Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of notability. The sources cited in the article are mostly trivial mentions of the company or its products. Some sources go into more depth on the products, but only a few discuss the company in any significant detail. Those that do are not independent or reliable, with the exception of two borderline sources (people.com and the second bustle.com). I have made a more detailed analysis at Talk:Shrill_Society. No more suitable sources were found. Overall, I do not believe that the criteria in WP:NORG have been met for this subject. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  dibbydib  boop or snoop 02:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Per WP:NOTINHERITED. Subject lacks notability on its own. Srijanx22 (talk) 06:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Nasty_woman per WP:NOTINHERITED. No evidence of independent notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:43, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge, per the nom's extensive analysis on the talk page. The sources are shaky and NORG is far from being met. SD0001 (talk) 16:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete As has been pointed out via the analysis on the Article Talk page, the references fail the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 15:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.