Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrivel

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 15:28 (UTC)

Shrivel
non-notable ArrowmanCoder 04:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete I don't see either portion of this article as being notable ArrowmanCoder 05:29, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, but remove the gamecruft. -Sean Curtin 05:03, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove the fancruft and keep the article. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 06:00, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. Remove the games ad. JamesBurns 06:04, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. If there's no wither, wane or rumple, why this?. --Misterwindupbird 06:27, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, possibly move to shrivelling. Not having one article is not a reason not to have another. Kappa 09:23, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to Wiktionary for gosh sakes. A dictionary definition is all this will ever be. If I'd labelled it so, however, some little person would have come and complained to me. So, while we're all voting on "shrivel" the trash is piling up at New Pages. --Wetman
 * Weak Keep. This is more that a dictdef as it provides a (brief) description of the physical process of shrivelling. (i.e. it tries to answer the why as well as the what). Pburka 13:19, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Then you should be voting to move it to the participle shrivelling, as per the naming conventions (verbs). Uncle G 13:29, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)
 * Keep the first part and expand the first part, merge the second. Capitalistroadster 15:59, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, gamecruft. ComCat 30 June 2005 19:23 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.