Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shudhu Gaan Geye Porichoy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Shudhu Gaan Geye Porichoy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamra vidhir (talk!) 11:08, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)




 * Strong Keep. Freshly created article about a very prominent Bengali song from 1970s, which is still popular and venerated after four decades and often regarded as signature or identifying song of Sabina Yasmin as done here, one of the most prominent artists of Bangladesh. The AfD is drive-by, in particular, as it seems, Tamravidhir may be relentlessly stalking (pardon my wording) and AfD-ing all articles created by him. Bangladesh deletion sorting page is filled with AfD's from mostly one user. It is up to question, whether all articles created by Sadman Sakibzz satisfy strong notability; but it is evident that  is not spending much time in investigating before boldly putting up for deletion discussion. Furthermore, she is explicitly threatening to ban. I am not sure if it is a case of Wikihounding, but one party may very well perceive it so. –  nafSadh  did say 21:14, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.