Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shugo Chara!Encore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn in favor of redirect to Shugo Chara!. (WP:NAC) —Farix (t &#124; c) 22:45, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Shugo Chara!Encore

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article should be deleted per WP:VERIFY, WP:PLOT, and WP:ORIGINAL: The page has no references whatsoever, and contains many original research statements such as "some believe it is just going to show all minor and main characters and what is happening to their life since the Easter climax has finished and their lives are normal". As well, this article is almost exclusively a plot summary, aside from an infobox. In addition, most of the information in the infobox does not relate to the page; only the last box is about the topic of the article. This article also does not contain any wikilinks and is orphaned, although that is pretty minor compared to its other issues. It would take a lot of work to bring this page up to standard, and I think it would be best to have it deleted; if in the future an editor wished to recreate it, they would have a fresh slate. Epass (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Shugo Chara!, where it's already covered. Unquestionably the series itself is notable, but we're better off covering this brief coda in the main article, as is standard for manga. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:53, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:55, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect to Shugo Chara!. Subject is already covered there along with the reliable sources. We don't need a spin out just to give an excessively detailed plot summary, which is not encyclopedic coverage of a subject. It may be advisable to block the article's creator as this is the seventh time they have recreated this article under different names. —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:59, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree; redirecting this page to Shugo Chara! sounds like the best course of action. Epass (talk) 22:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Does that mean that you are withdrawing the nomination in favor of the redirect? —Farix (t &#124; c) 22:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought one of the possible outcomes from an AfD discussion was the redirect, but if it would be easier for me to just withdraw the nomination, I'm willing to. Epass (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.