Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shukko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. There is no consensus here whether this is just a dictionary entry or a valid notable encyclopedic entry. Davewild (talk) 12:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Shukko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a description of a particular Japanese word relating to job conditions. WP is not a dictionary, and any worthy material should be incorporated into an article with an English title, such as "Job conditions in Japan". Imaginatorium (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Imaginatorium (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Rambling essay filled with original research. --DAJF (talk) 23:05, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep but major revision, or delete per WP:TNT. The concept is notable and spawns a not-bad number of sources discussing it specifically, including general discussions and specific case studies alike as from this search I tried.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 13:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Um, so... neutral? -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 04:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:37, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a notable topic in Japanese business culture and this is not just a dictionary entry. As shown above, a search for sources finds sufficient coverage of this topic in academic journals. Those journal articles also use the Japanese term rather than some English translation. --Cckerberos (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.