Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shulamite Ezechi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. While opinion seems close here, those arguing to Keep this article all have low edit counts and limited experience evaluating articles at AFD. I don't always look at the article in question but considering the previous AfD closed as Delete I thought I should look it over and I agree with those editor supporting Deletion about the low quality of the sources in this article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Shulamite Ezechi
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Every source in the article is either non-independent (including interviews) or provided no significant coverage. BEFORE searches on Google and ProQuest remain unpromising Mach61 (talk) 07:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Nigeria,  and Scotland. Mach61 (talk) 07:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does pass WP:ANYBIO. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I definitely meant Doesn’t in the above. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: by the BEFORE search performed during nomination. बिनोद थारू (talk) 00:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: I believe subject has received coverage in secondary source to pass WP:ANYBIO such as here, here, and here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itomishor (talk • contribs) 10:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * These sources are secondary, but not independent; the former source is a university Ezechi was affiliated with, the latter two interviews. Mach61 (talk) 11:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The university is independent and secondary source since she is not affiliated. The institution is acknowledging her notable achievement in the society. Not all alumni gets celebrated except they are making unique notable contribution in the society. Itomishor (talk) 23:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: The subject is supported by secondary sources though the independence of the sources is vague. So, I am voting week keep the article because of its potentials.Bekilicious (talk) 17:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: it has coverage on multiple secondary source. Dcraigo (talk) 10:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.