Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuman Ghosemajumder (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash talk 19:21, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Shuman Ghosemajumder
Marked for speedy deletion as a recreation of previously deleted content. However as I can't find a copy of the deleted content I'm notminating it here. The previous debate was in May 2004 and would today have been closed as no consensus (this is long before my time so I don't know whether this is representative of debates back then) so imho this another reason for another hearing. No vote. Thryduulf 14:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * delete - Doesn't meet notability criteria. --bodnotbod 20:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I was the one who tagged it for speedy delete. This bio is of a non-notable person. OCNative 23:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable as long as the article is referenced. Well-referenced. &mdash;Eternal Equinox | talk 01:18, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per bodnotbod. Master and Commander 08:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets notability criteria as author of wide-selling book (CGI Programming Unleashed). - Fenster 16:15, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per bodnotbod Wiki4Life 04:48, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I just noticed that the account Wiki4Life has been created just to vote on two AfD pages. WesternMustang 04:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per bodnotbod. Ardenn 06:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Former CEO? Published author of a major text on CGI programming? Cited as an external reference (per "What links here") on 14 different articles relating to P2P and file-sharing topics? Seems notable enough to me, personally...keep. Bearcat 20:40, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bearcat. Notable achievements, author of major book, many references. BfDx 06:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per Fenster, Bearcat, etc. TrinityC 03:25, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Vernamc 03:29, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, per bearcat, obviously the author of a significant book on internet programming, with links from many other articles, and numerous press citations should be kept; debating achievements alone are notable. HHR 17:11, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Obvious Keep. Based on content and references, original nom seems malicious or erroneous. -- WesternMustang 02:43, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * keep as per WesternMustang -- Geo Swan 17:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.