Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shurpanakha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Shurpanakha

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet notability, no news sources and what's published in a few books is not enough Australianblackbelt (talk) 12:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:25, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Perfectly adequate sourcing, no basis at all for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 14:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, frivolous nomination based on musings about "news sources" and "a few books". Geschichte (talk) 16:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep! a significant character of the Ramayana. Richman's book is very useful as it explains Shurpanakha from her birth to rejection, even mentions various versions. If this is not enough, I can provide more sources! .💠 245CMR 💠. •👥📜 03:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Given sources clearly establish notability. Blablubbs | talk 00:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Content is accurate, only citations to be provided. Sandeep
 * Keep - sourcing is enough to meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.