Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shwarp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:02, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Shwarp
Delete. Prod was "Hoax. Googling (shwarp and golf) produces 29 n/a hits." Deprod by anon was "Regardless of Google results, this is not a hoax. It is a new word that is heard more and more frequently." Article was rewritten a bit by the anon, but the point remains the same. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Neologism possible heard only in close proximity to the author. Kevin 03:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wait for some notability to come to this word. Metros232 03:22, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This neologism requires references and citations from popular media to demontrate common usage. If these can be supplied, then it could be considered for Wiktionary.   (aeropagitica)    (talk)   04:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete randomcrapcruft again M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If not a hoax, it is certainly non-notable. Ted 04:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikitionary at best, or as an entry under golf terms, if its use were ever attested.Dlohcierekim 05:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 09:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ProhibitOnions 12:32, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete protologism per CrazyRussian -- Samir [[Image:Canadian maple leaf 2.jpg|20px]] (the scope) धर्म 18:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete just rubbish Mrjeff 17:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I mean, really, does there need to be a new article every time someone comes up with a "cool new word"? --UsaSatsui 20:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.