Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shweta Bachchan-Nanda (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash;SW&mdash; confabulate 22:52, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Shweta Bachchan-Nanda
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. Lead says it all - she's only known because of her family. Bbb23 (talk) 17:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: Non-notable personality. Inherits notability from other family members. Some information worth including; i.e. DOB, was (non-notable) journalist, hosted some (non-notable) TV show; may be included in Bachchan family. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge with her father's article unless notability can be established. Being a Bachan daughter alone is not worth of notability The Determinator   p  t  c  20:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep or redirect. Claim of non-notability seem to be based on Western bias.
 * Better to use
 * or.
 * -- Petri Krohn (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you really have to include the part about the bias? Hidden agendas lurking everywhere on Wikipedia. What a world.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I am Indian. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 22:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No need for you to disclose that, but, let's see, that would make it a double reverse, partial bluff, ricocheting western bias.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete -- the few news sources available on her make it clear that any interest secondary sources have in her is rooted in her having famous relatives; there's no independent notability here. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Just delete, no need of discussion in such cases. -- ɑηsuмaη  ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 08:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.