Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shy line


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Shy line

 * — (View AfD)

Contested prod. I just don't feel that there's enough material for a full blown article. This is a hockey (that's ice hockey) line that has been together for a year. While I don't doubt that some broadcasters use it, it is also not significant enough to keep around. The article contains WP:OR appreciation of the line's quality of play. If we stick to the actual verifiable content, the article will most likely become and remain a sub-stub. Pascal.Tesson 00:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as cruft. Some lines such as the French Connection will become legendary, but this is not it. skrshawk  (  Talk  |  Contribs  ) 03:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - seems pretty close to non-notable neologism territory.-- Dmz5 *Edits**Talk* 03:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism that's not commonly used even in New York City, let alone in the hockey world. Hockey commentators create dozens of this type of neologism every year. While reading the article 15 came to mind. None were notable. -- Charlene 05:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.--Meno25 07:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 07:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom John Vandenberg 23:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 04:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 04:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-sourced, non-notable neologism, and I'll take Charlene.fic's word that it's not even a neologism in NY! SkierRMH 04:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete petty... - crz crztalk 04:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.