Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sibaya Casino and Entertainment Kingdom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Sibaya Casino and Entertainment Kingdom

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Was draftified in the hopes of improvement, but moved back without any significant changes. Currently, no in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources, and searches did not turn up any.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   15:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 18:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: There is this recent North Coast Rising Sun piece describing the venue and its community involvement, but it is predominantly interview-based and wouldn't be enough to sustain WP:NCORP in itself. AllyD (talk) 15:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a well-known casino and easily meets WP:GNG. A few minutes of searching produced a large amount of material. Here's news coverage about it from WP:RS (IOL carries coverage from multiple newspapers in the Independent Newspapers Group) . Sunday Times/Times Live: . Incidental coverage from Sunday Times: . News24: . I can add more links if these are deemed insufficient, I got tired of pasting them. Park3r (talk) 02:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Per wp:ITSAPUBLICATTRACTION, an excellent essay. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 01:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Park3r's comment. GeographicAccountant (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per wp:ITSAPUBLICATTRACTION, and per Park3r's comment. Jedi wiki 10 (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG (I've searched) and the WP:ITSAPUBLICATTRACTION essay is utterly unconvincing and has no links to policy at all, it's just the opinion of an author who thinks that all castles and tourists attracts are notable. I'll make my !vote based on policy and guidance not someone who doesn't respect them. CT55555 (talk) 02:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.