Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siberia Airlines Flight 852


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ and doesn't appear more input is forthcoming Star   Mississippi  02:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Siberia Airlines Flight 852

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

While it received coverage at the time, does not pass WP:NEVENT.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge with Aviastar-TU Flight 1906 Jack4576 (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @Jack4576, these are different incidents involving the same plane at different times. What's the justification for merging them? ~Kvng (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * This information is going to be deleted otherwise; but we may be able to have an article documenting multiple incidents of this plane. Jack4576 (talk) 15:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @Jack4576, why do you think this is going to be (or should be) deleted? ~Kvng (talk) 16:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * because I think other editors will find Onel5969’s reasons persuasive on policy grounds (even though I have moral objections to that policy) Jack4576 (talk) 16:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * If notability cannot be established, I suggest redirecting to S7 Airlines. Alvaldi (talk) 20:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:16, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. It really doesn't seem to be that noteworthy of an incident, but I'm not positive.   Russian news archives on the web from 2002 are practically nonexistent, so we'd have to rely on print sources to see if there was some sustained coverage.   The only thing that moves the needle over to the keep side for me is that I did a search on newspapers.com and I saw it reported on Page 19 of the Victoria Advocate, from Victoria Texas, on January 15, 2002, so it DID receive international news coverage, likely wire service coverage because I doubt the Victoria Advocate sent reporters over there.   There are probably others, but I was only searching for "Omsk" between January 13 2002 and January 20 2002 on Newspapers.com, which is pretty much only English language sources.   My web searches found better and clearer descriptions of what happened than the really bad machine translation that this article is currently but I won't spend the time on it for now if it's just going to be deleted for notability.   There MAY have been changes in airline policy as far as the selection of alternate aircraft, or decisions to hold flights based on weather predictions, I just don't have a good way of finding out for now, so that's just a guess.   RecycledPixels (talk) 15:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails GNG, EVENT, LASTING, and NOTNEWS. per the article, "All eight people on board survived, but the aircraft was damaged beyond repair." no deaths, plane damaged. Minor news event, no lasting impact or coverage.  // Timothy :: talk  21:10, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.