Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sibley-Monroe checklist 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Sibley-Monroe checklist 2

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

LISTCRUFT. I'd also suggest moving Sibley-Monroe checklist 1 to Sibley–Monroe checklist. Therapyisgood (talk) 02:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete all per nom. Cavalryman (talk) 01:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the lot, including #1. Really pointless - excessive duplication of off-line content at best, of Wikipedia content at worst (to the extent that it mirrors current accepted taxonomy, which we have well documented). Possibly there could be a short article on the importance of the list in its historical context, if the requisite sourcing is available, but that would certainly not consist of 18 pages of links. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree they're pointless. But reducing Sibley-Monroe checklist 1 to just the text and calling it "Sibley-Monroe checklist" or "Sibley-Monroe taxonomy" (analogous to The Clements Checklist of Birds of the World) would be good. Craigthebirder (talk) 13:16, 7 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.