Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sibley County ICTV System


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 10:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Sibley County ICTV System

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Listen, I know I've been doing this a lot and getting yelled at to slow down, but I don't think a TV article serving a small community in Minnesota deserves its own article. The communities are just too small for this article to comply with WP:GNG. JTZegers (talk) 12:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable early telelearning effort; project has been defunct for thirty years so it's certainly not a PROMO of anything.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 17:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:27, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:27, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:27, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 06:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep This system apparently attracted enough national attention, including from the National School Boards Association—I just added a source mentioning this. More sourcing is needed on the system details. There is also another source that someone with the right WP:TWL access might be able to obtain: David Czech, "Fax TV and the Remote Classroom," T H E Journal, Vol 16, No 8, April 1989, pp 69-72. Raymie (t • c) 00:01, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.