Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sichenzia Ross Ference Kesner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Sichenzia Ross Ference Kesner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional and at most borderline notable. Part of a PR effort which includes the article on the founder, and an attempt to add advertising links for their various services .and other people connected with the company  DGG ( talk ) 18:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Firstly, as DGG says, the article is promotional. (It was created by an editor with a history of creating promotional articles, beyond all reasonable doubt an undisclosed paid editor.) Secondly, there is a total lack of evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The references include several press releases, pages about the individual partners who own the company (not about the company), pages which merely include the company in a list, and so on. My own searches produced the company's own web site, this Wikipedia article, more press releases, LinkedIn, etc etc: nothing even suggesting notability. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete purely promotional. Articles on law firms that advertise on Wikipedia should be deleted on sight IMHO. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 02:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.