Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sichuan Airlines Flight 8633


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 16:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Sichuan Airlines Flight 8633

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor air incident. Fails as per WP:NOTNEWS.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * keep: Recommend renaming to "Sichuan Airlines Flight 8633 accident".--Steven Sun (talk) 14:48, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: Per Steven Sun. It's not minor air incident. Because there are many reports about this incident, and it has been recycled as a film which is The Captain. -- 風雲北洋 WP ※English is very difficult 15:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - this is a major incident widely reported in media and the pilots have won multiple national awards for their heroics. A film based on the incident was just released, see The Captain (2019 film). British Airways Flight 5390, a very similar incident, has had an article for 15 years. -Zanhe (talk) 20:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable and received WP:SIGCOV. — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 00:43, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep The incident is notable due to high media coverage and inspiring a motion picture.TH1980 (talk) 01:52, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep – commercial jetliners having windshields blown off are an extremely rare occurrence. That almost by itself makes it notable, let alone one that received decent international news coverage and now also made into a film. Not to mention the aeronautical feat of a disabled flight crew pulling off an emergency landing from an open cockpit and with half the instrument panel wrecked. --Deeday-UK (talk) 11:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * keep: aircraft incidents are sufficiently rare events to be noticeable especially given the importance of air transport safety. Moreover in this one, the flight ended well and no major injuries are to be reported which is again rare case. Also, a similar incident has its own page (see British Airways Flight 5390) --G.Dupont (talk) 14:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Steven Sun (talk). --SalmanZ (talk) 15:12, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Despite the fact that one of the sources is a press release and another is a list of a320 incidents, all the sources together, especially the Reuters and CNN stories, add up to a GNG pass. Hydromania (talk) 10:17, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Per Deeday-UK. This is a notable explosive decompression event. Insidious611 (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep #1 you should do your own notability check first, and #2 this is among the few that survived!--H2254625 (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above. If a feature-length movie is made out of the incident, NOTNEWS shouldn't even be considered. Oakshade (talk) 02:31, 10 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.