Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sick Happy Idle (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Sick Happy Idle
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This topic about a zine that fails WP:GNG. For additional opinion about media on Wikipedia, see Notability (media). Northamerica1000(talk) 12:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unless there are sources out there that never made it onto the Internet, there doesn't seem to have been any in-depth coverage of this zine in any independent and reliable sources. I see one or two offhand mentions or trivial sources here and there, but overall there are no sources that are in-depth, reliable, and secondary. The rationale for the previous deletion's "no consensus" is fairly weak even by 2005 standards and by all rights, should've been deleted long ago.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 19:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not Notable --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of sources. Found one notable mention in The Guardian: "the fanzines Dark Star and Sick Happy Idle continue their inimitable assault on good taste". -- Green Cardamom (talk) 06:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.