Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sick Monster Body

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 15:32, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sick Monster Body
This appears to be a term used only by a tiny group of people, and thus I believe it falls below the notability threshhold for inclusion in wikipedia. Perhaps it is more suited to one of the internet's numerous urban dictionary websites. I think this article should consequently be deleted from wikipedia. -- John Fader 23:01, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, a phrase coined by two amateur bodybuilders, not notable --nixie 01:16, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable - zero Google hits for that phrase. Megan1967 03:10, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism, invention, etc. (The editor has prematurely attempted to stick it on VfU already.) --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 04:11, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism. Something could possibly be written about the "Age of Freaks" in professional bodybuilding, but this term is just the recent invention of a couple of amateur bodybuilders.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 05:52, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Undelete. I am a body builder in the West Hollywood region of Los Angeles and have been hearing this word frequently.  It seems that Eric Leven's "invented neologism" has spread and has become an accepted term for a certain body type/physical mentality/sexual orientation. EricZeiler 18:21, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) (comment added by user:24.126.117.2)
 * Comment: The article hasn't been deleted yet, so "undelete" is not a valid vote. Also, what on earth does sexual orientation have to do with this?   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 04:52, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Note that this was User:24.126.117.2's only contribution to Wikipedia. I suspect trolling. Well, I hope it's trolling. Note also that the creator of the article, 64.14.248.62 (talk &bull; contribs), is a serial vandal. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 05:33, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Kill it, kill it! &mdash;Neuropedia 23:33, 2005 Feb 27 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang terms Trödel| talk  16:03, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)