Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sid Sriram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 00:56, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Sid Sriram

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not Enough Content ,No Valid Source, No Image ,A9, Not Important To Wikipedia Satya durga reddy (talk) 09:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    09:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    09:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    09:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Simply not enough for a better article at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  07:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep – Clearly meets WP:NMUSIC. Agree, the article is weak in terms of sourcing but that doesn't necessarily mean we should delete the page. Coming to the nominator's rationale – "Not Enough Content ,No Valid Source, No Image ,A9, Not Important To Wikipedia", the article clearly has a content and is good enough to identify the subject, lack of images isn't a valid concern, A9 is irrelevant here. On a side note, the nominator seems to have made another faulty AFD. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 11:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Unfortunately no RS. The one seeming RS, The Hindu, is an interview and therefore doesn't support notability. There are now dozens, perhaps hundreds, of online music sites, both those that stream and those that report, but until we have some way to evaluate those we'll need to stick to standard sources. As I read in Billboard, he hasn't yet released on a known label and thus has not charted. This is probably too soon. Possibly up and coming, but not yet up and came. LaMona (talk) 19:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom, SwisterTwister, and particularly LaMona's excellent analysis. Searches turned up nothing from reliable sources to show notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.