Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidda Reddy Ankireddypalli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While cites a source, they do not explain how the subject is covered in this source in a way that would convey notability, and neither is that apparent from the article, as  points out.  Sandstein  10:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Sidda Reddy Ankireddypalli

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There's no evidence of notability in these sources, which mention Sidda Reddy Ankireddypalli only in passing without any particular focus on him. The doctor doesnt satisfy WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV criteria. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources in the article are not enough for WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV . Fad Ariff (talk) 12:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep (barely) per
 * ,
 * Vemula, R., & Hanu, G. (2019). History of neurosurgery at sri venkateswara institute of medical sciences, tirupati. Neurology India, 67(1), 207-217. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.253574
 * Definitely more notable than most of the the athlete articles.  // Timothy :: talk  04:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. We have a text about a neurosurgeon. I mean, that is the whole text. It veritably reads: This is a neurosurgeon. End of text. One cannot help but admire the chutzpah but one is also nonplussed. The sources confirm that he is a neurosurgeon who is active as a neurosurgeon. That is all. The case is blatantly not made that this is an individual who merits to have a Wikipedia article about him more than the millions of neurosurgeons around the world. It is not even funny. -The Gnome (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.