Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siddhant Ghegadmal (Actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Siddhant Ghegadmal (Actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication of notability. Most of the appearances in films listed are as an "extra". Majority of sources are either imdb or youtube. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 00:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If this AfD fails, please merge Draft:Siddhant Ghegadmal (Actor) into this. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 01:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 00:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: No evidence of playing significant roles to meet WP:NACTOR. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I see dozens of pages just like this every day but they are usually in Draft space. Doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like a lot of new actors are spamming here now. Doesn't qualify the guidelines. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NACTOR, as per above. Severe  storm  28  12:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Just a note that both Siddhant Ghegadmal and Draft:Siddhant Ghegadmal are protected from creation. I thought I'd seen this article before. Liz Read! Talk! 01:51, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Given the existence of Sockpuppet investigations/Siddhant Ghegadmal, do we need to go back to SPI and/or make a case for a G5 speedy? --Finngall talk 02:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I filed a new case for this SPI. As an admin though, I like to see ban evasion confirmation before deleting pages. Let's see this AFD through. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 29 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete as others have said. Fails WP:NACTOR, and is likely just WP:PROMO. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.