Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siddhanth K.S.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  23:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Siddhanth K.S.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another non-notable article created by the same account. As with the others, there is no reliable coverage to establish notability and subject falls well short of WP:GNG. Some references are self-promotion as they come from his website while others are only brief mentions. I cannot find any sources outside of what was already placed in the article to establish notability. FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 17:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: -All these links clearly state his roles in production and direction. Dr Adil (talk) 20:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: - I'm happy to help improve this article as I think the subject has merit as a Wikipedia entry. I am conducting a wider search for additional references that will help satisfy the notability criteria.G2003 (talk) 10:32, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. My God, what is it with India and random biographies of non-notable people? It seems disproportionate. The sources are all passing mentions which don't actually establish the article's subject as an individual of note. His name being mentioned isn't enough for WP:Notability (people). MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - I assumed good faith in the beginning, but this is ultimately SPAM. Creator removed my comments from their talk page advising them to add reliable sources and giving them time to do it. Instead, they created additional SPAM pages without addressing the issues with the first ones. Not sure what else I could have done other than taking them to AfD. Hope it sorts itself out here. --FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 17:32, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.