Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidney Campodonico Filho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Sidney Campodonico Filho

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable autobiography. Was speedied twice; once today, and the subject put it back up minutes later. CyberGhostface (talk) 00:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete criteria, probably. Obvious conflict of interests, extremely little notability, fails WP:BIO, etc. Bsimmons666 (talk) 00:09, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: Can a Portugese reading editor look at some of THESE?  Schmidt, ' MICHAEL Q. 00:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 01:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   — John Z (talk) 02:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article proves no notability, and I can't see any that I can read. Then, there's the COI, the POV, the putting it back up... Drmies (talk) 04:54, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Who is this guy and why does he think WP is a free resume-hosting service? Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete MQS: I am Portuguese and I reviewed those links, plus the Portuguese Wikipedia article. It doesn't add up, as per WP:BIO and WP:RS.  Sorry, Doc. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.