Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siebel EIM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete per A7, article about a website that does not assert it's significance. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  17:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Siebel_EIM
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I strongly feel this is not a topic to have a separate page in Wikipedia, as encyclopedic content. There are forums and websites outside of wikipedia like ittoolbox where this topic has been discussed quite extensively. Siebel EIM is just a feature / functionality offered by a product and it could very well go away in the future. So I feel this page is not apt. Sean rave (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SorryGuy  Talk  06:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  18:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 06:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as either g11 (spam) or a7 (web). At first, I thought it should only be marked as g11, but it does not appear to be notable as of yet. Should another article that is sourced, neutral, and establishes notability be created, then (and only then) no prejudice to recreation. The Evil Spartan (talk) 16:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.