Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sienna Falls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Sienna Falls

 * — (View AfD)

Contested speedy deletion candidate. An abandoned housing project somewhere, has no sources, and does not sound in the least notable. Sandstein 18:44, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Extremely non-notable. &mdash;  Ed Gl  18:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per above. → &ensp; J A R E D &ensp;(t)&ensp; 22:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The page does not assert the subject's notability, and it doesn't seem to be very notable from Google. "Sienna Falls" "Burwood East" turns up one result from Google, and Sienna Falls seems to be featured in Whitehorse Leader on 30 June 2004 (AEST) according to that result, but the development is seems nonetheless generally non-notable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Goh wz (talk • contribs) 16:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.