Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sienna West


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:08, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Sienna West

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and the GNG. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. No reliably sourced biographical content. Neither the Adam Film World Award nor the CAVR award contributes to notability under WP:PORNBIO. Article has been summarily deleted on three previous occasions; all this version may add is an unverified claim about a one-night stand with an NBA player, which is likely a BLP violation. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - This line is unsourced in a BLP: Since then she has appeared in MILF pornography, female ejaculation scenes, foot fetish pornography, and in vignettes. Are you all really okay with that? Another excellent illustration of my belief that the vast majority of these Porn Cruft pseudo bios (actually advertisements or fan homages) should be summarily dispatched. Damned few would pass GNG, including this one, let alone a healthy reading of the intent of our BLP rules. Carrite (talk) 23:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ..... and salt per the nominator's note that this is recreation of a previously deleted article. Carrite (talk) 23:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You didn't notice the potential defamatory statements about Peja Stojakovic in the article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Nominations and win. --Lexusuns (talk) 16:46, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete unsourced bio. The awards from an unknown magazine are near worthless.  Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 07:47, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Minor award win and nominations in a single year are not enough to pass WP:PORNBIO. Also lacks non-trivial RS coverage to pass GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No general notability, no article. Porn award nominations are not suitable for establishing notability. Tarc (talk) 16:23, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above comments 173.70.41.19 (talk) 06:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as porn awards establish notability. --WR Reader (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per WP:PORNBIO - industry awards of minimal independent note do not assert wikipedia notability.  You really can  02:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.