Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra Vista Mall (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I don't see a consensus to redirect after this deletion, but if an editor thinks a fresh redirect is warranted, I would leave that to them. If it gets recreated again, you can ask for salt with your CSD#G4 Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; WER  02:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Sierra Vista Mall
AfDs for this article: DRVs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing AfD listing by IP editor, who wrote, "NN shopping mall. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Was deleted in Articles_for_deletion/Sierra_Vista_Mall_(3rd_nomination).--180.172.239.231 (talk) 8:39 am, Yesterday (UTC−4)" -- RoySmith (talk) 15:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Note There is a Sierra Vista mall in Bisbee, Arizona, 672 miles from this mall.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Clovis, CA with template R with possibilities, retain talk page, userfy on request with full edit history. WP:BEFORE D1 shows a 200-page scholarly book about this mall.  Here is 3-sentence coverage by the AP carried in Fredericksburg, VA:
 * The primary source shows the topic to have 78 acres, which puts it up into the super-regional mall category, where there is no real doubt of wp:notability, and any lingering doubt is resolved by WP:BEFORE D1. The article appears to be credible, but without readers being able to verify that the material comes from a reliable source with a reputation for fact checking, the material is not appropriate for Wikipedia.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The primary source shows the topic to have 78 acres, which puts it up into the super-regional mall category, where there is no real doubt of wp:notability, and any lingering doubt is resolved by WP:BEFORE D1. The article appears to be credible, but without readers being able to verify that the material comes from a reliable source with a reputation for fact checking, the material is not appropriate for Wikipedia.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Material has been removed from this article subsequent to the start of the AfD.  Here is a link to the article at the time of the nomination.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Can't find anything more than passing mentions. No significant coverage in Google Books or ProQuest but the passing mentions to be expected from the American institution that serves the role of community center. I can't find any dedicated articles or even that 200-page book (there is one in the deletion review about malls in general, but that's 240 pages). Moreover, this is the fifth unique AfD for this topic and the sourcing has not become more robust over time: time for salt. Please ping me if non-English or offline sources are found. czar ♔   15:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a building, and it happens to have several stores in it. Notability is not asserted. Reywas92 Talk 02:43, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.