Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra West Airlines Flight 887


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. After discounting the input by Mil Mi-888 (blocked for socking) and Username006 (no policy-based argument), consensus is clear.  Sandstein  10:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Sierra West Airlines Flight 887

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Tragic but cargo plane crashes are very common and not usually notable. WP:NOTNEWS also applies. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Accidents happen; something unusual has to be present to warrant an article, and this one doesn't have it. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete doesnt appear to have any noteworthy features that would meet the requirements for a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 10:39, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

I think it's enough news already talked about this tragedy, when you search Falcon crash or Cargo crash. LIKE these news report. WRDW
 * Keep,Command

AP NEWS

WJBF

WSPA

KTSM

WSBTV

And also aircraft totally destroyed and all occupants passed away, is not very common. Mil Mi-888 (talk) 21:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment As seen above, it seems to be having several sources so it already has significant coverage. However, incidents are rather uncommon to see this. Not sure if it does or does not break the barrier for a notable article. Definetely not common but also not rare either. KlientNo.1 (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:51, 13 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Average Keep Looks Like this accident have some enough news, and seems like a few news talk about other falcon 20 problem.

And per above, seems like the accident not common, but also not rare, maybe can keep for some times.Nikolai Bochkareav (talk) 01:49, 14 October 2021 (UTC) — Nikolai Bochkareav (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. struck sock vote Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 15:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 17:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources added are just WP:ROUTINE coverage that don't meet WP:NEVENT. Subject fails WP:NOTNEWS. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Such a tragic incident with such coverage should be kept. This is not a private Cessna 152 which crashes into a forest. This is a twin-jet cargo aircraft gets broken apart with no survivors and with significant coverage so on. However, this article does need more information than what is provided. Username006 (talk) 16:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.