Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sift Heads


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Delete Mandsford 15:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Sift Heads

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable game, A7 does not apply. No sources that indicate notability. &mdash; Timneu22 &middot; &#32; talk 13:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC) Please allow this article stay. This game means alot to people around the world and almost everyone in my community loves it. Please don't delete it! Please! I'm begging you!- tyler775
 * Speedy delete WP:CSD, so tagged. I think for an "online flash game" db-web "article about a web site, blog... browser game, or similar web content that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject" covers it, but I'll leave for another admin so as to get a second pair of eyes. JohnCD (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, my mistake. I should have tagged for A7 because it's a web game. But, based on the comment below, A7 wouldn't have been honored so I guess it's okay that we're here. &mdash; Timneu22 &middot; &#32; talk 17:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * A7 declined asserts millions of players and multiple awards... though these are completely unreferenced. I've also cleaned up the spelling, grammar, and punctuation a bit.  This article has all the hallmarks of being created by a young fan of these games.  I'm seeing a lot of Ghits on the game, but none that spring to the fore as clearly RS. This would be a great job for a rescue. Jclemens (talk) 15:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC) - Thank you Mr. Jclemens. Thank you.
 * Delete as it stands, per complete lack of independent sources, let alone to prove the claim of popularity (the only "notability" claim the article makes). I agree with Jclemens...could be fixable if someone can find some actual WP:RS. DMacks (talk) 18:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)- I'll find more sources. I already found one new one.
 * Delete. I took at shot at finding sources, but failed to turn up anything but self-published web content.  Doesn't look like this game has ever gotten any attention from reliable sources, unfortunately. —chaos5023 (talk) 02:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – Notability not made by a mile. Also note that Sift heads was deleted about 5 times already and salted (but no AFD, so we might as well develop that consensus now). –MuZemike 00:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.