Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siftery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Siftery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, fails WP:CORP. Insufficient coverage to pass the notability requirements. Bilby (talk) 23:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - The sources in the article do not establish notability, and my own searches turn up press releases and blogs mostly. Reporting is on them getting financing which is regular business news.  The company fairly new so no objection to recreation if they become notable in the future but they don't pass the notability bar at this point. -- Whpq (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.