Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigappunada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After two relistings, no consensus has been reached. Of note is that "no indication of significance" could be interpreted as "non notable", but the nominator did not state the latter directly. Also of note is that at the time of nomination for deletion, the article did not contain "large portions" not in English (diff), although two image captions were not in English. The majority was written in English. The image captions were later written in English by a user who copy edited the article (diff). North America1000 22:52, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Sigappunada

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of significance and large portions of the article are not in english. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:27, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Relltechno7 (talk) 12:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC) Since i am new to wikipedia,I am trying my best to improve the articles,the above article is about the history of an old magazine.some words are in Tamil language cause the magazine title was derived from a tamil word for red tape.Talk to me
 * Previous post posted at 2016-08-13T12:59:02‎. Unscintillating (talk) 14:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Please append your posts with four tildes ("~") . Respectfully, Unscintillating (talk) 14:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't see anything that's not in English, let alone "large portions of the article". Searches for the correct Roman alphabet spelling:
 * There is some book coverage of the legal case in English, but a search for Tamil sources (by someone less linguistically challenged than I) would be needed to determine whether the publication meets our notability guidelines. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * There is some book coverage of the legal case in English, but a search for Tamil sources (by someone less linguistically challenged than I) would be needed to determine whether the publication meets our notability guidelines. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  15:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment According to  an editor in 1983 was "lodged in the Madras Central Prison May 20 to serve a sentence after being convicted of scurrilous writing and contempt of court, ' Indian Express' ..."  This happened after a Supreme Court case in regard to accusing the High Court judges of Madras of corruption, at which time an apology was made and ten days later retracted.  One of the books covering this case at Google books is dated 1997.    ties this journal to a restart of the journal in 2008 using a different name.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Nomination has only looked at the article.  "No indication of significance" is WP:A7, an inapplicable speedy deletion argument.  New editors can't fix problems that either haven't been identified or don't exist.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep WP:SK WP:NPASR No argument for deletion, no WP:DEL-REASON cited.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.