Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sight (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade;  &sect; ( Message ) -  19:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Sight (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Little meaningful, substantive, significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. The film fails film notability guidelines. Google search.  Dr Strauss   talk   20:18, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep because the four reviews in the "Reception" section absolutely qualify as significant coverage to make the film notable per WP:GNG. Per WP:SIGCOV, "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." The film is the main topic of these four reviews, so it is more than enough. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 20:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. As per Erik's statements above, the film has enough coverage in its reception to stick around. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:44, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Solid Keep per having coverage to meet WP:NF.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:01, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.