Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sight For Sore Eyes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy deleted, no assertion of notability. -- lucasbfr talk 08:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Sight For Sore Eyes

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No doubt a worthy organization, but appears quite unnotable. No references or sources except for the orgs own web site. Sdmittedly the creation of a college student. No mention of media coverage. No indication of the kind of project scope likely to get non-local media coverage. There are many local groups that work on similer projects with the Lions clubs. This has been twice speedy deleted and recreated, but I don't think it is quite a speedy. DES (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom unless independent reliable sources are cited so as to establish notability. DES (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - written as advert, just read the last sentence of the first paragraph. -wizzard2k  ( C &#x2022;  T  &#x2022;  D ) 15:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable HeirloomGardener 15:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as does not meet notability standards, and has little coverage other than its own site.  J o s h  15:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Bordering on spam and not notable (founded in April 2007, I mean come on...)...candidate for speedy, so tagged. -Cquan (don't yell at me...) 20:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.