Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siglem 575


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Siglem 575

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Newly created poetry structure. Unknown within the internetworks. Seems to be the work of one or two individuals. All references seem to be blogs. Unworthy of Wikipedia. scope_creep (talk) 00:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete we get these every now and then: some made-up poetry form. Appears on a handful of personal blogs, which have all been added to the article as refs -- zero Gbooks hits. Nothing at all from any reliable independent source. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as sources are only announcements and the information is equally similar and unconvincing, nothing else is substantial. SwisterTwister   talk  04:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.