Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Omega Epsilon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:58, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Sigma Omega Epsilon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This page has Zero references and is written in POV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.249.47.196 (talk) 18:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The proceeding nomination was copied from Talk:Sigma Omega Epsilon. I have completed the nominating process on behalf of the above IP Editor who was unable to do so themselves, and will comment separately on the merits of the deletion nomination. Monty  845  20:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment The sorority appears to exist, and has multiple chapters, but there is a dearth of independent reliable sources that provide coverage of the subject. What news articles I could find were relatively trivial and not enough to establish Notability. A regular google search turns up mostly self published material. Unless someone can find some reliable sources, it looks like delete to me. Monty  845  20:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:45, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Insufficient demonstration of notability.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:26, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:40, 13 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking coverage in independent third party sources. Feel free to pin my talk page if such sources get added to the page. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, my searches found about zero. Cavarrone (talk) 09:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.