Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Omega Phi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 05:45, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Sigma Omega Phi
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Very small local sorority with fewer than 7 chapters; geographically limited to Southern Northern California; not recognized by any national umbrella organization; fails general notability guideline's requirement of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", as all sources are either WP:SELFPUB or minor mentions. GrapedApe (talk) 23:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete&mdash;Per nom; there's no coverage in RS other than routine mentions, and not many of those. Maybe you meant Northern California? &mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 01:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete; lacking substantial coverage by independent sources, it seems to fail the GNG. bobrayner (talk) 12:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I spent a little time today looking and find hardly any mention in independent sources.Fayedizard (talk) 10:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I did a search to see what i could find and nothing. So, this should be deleted per the lack of reliable sources. — ΛΧΣ  21™  01:46, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.