Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Partners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:12, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Sigma Partners

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This article was deleted as an uncontested prod. I've restored it per a request at WP:REFUND. The original prod rationale was "No evidence of notability". I'm neutral at the moment. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:43, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Uncertain - it is possible that the firm is notable; but if it is, this article doesn't make the case. I know I'm the stereotype evialllll deletionist, but I don't want to kneejerk D on this one if they are actually notable and the original editor wasn't Wikicompetent enough to make it clear. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  13:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, weakly. I looked at the Google News results.  A venture capital firm, they have generated a prodigious number of press releases announcing that they've funded some startup or another.  But looking through the first several pages, almost every one of them is a press release.  The few genuinely independent stories I found had only incidental coverage, and were not about this firm. There might be one in depth story in Business Week, but Google Books is not showing enough to tell. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron.  Snotty Wong   yak 21:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Smerdis. Vast majority of sources are regurgitated press releases and PR.  Fails WP:GNG.  Snotty Wong   communicate 23:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep A major newspaper interviews one of the guys working there about this group, doing a very detailed article. Other mentions of them are there as well, just sort through the Google news results.   D r e a m Focus  09:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.