Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma code


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 14:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Sigma code

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

While I was able to find this book on Amazon, there's nothing in this article or elsewhere to suggest that this book has "gained cult status amongst conspiracy theorists". Amazon reveals that it's published by AuthorHouse, a self-publishing company. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 23:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. On another note, the synopsis is lifted directly from Amazon, with only a couple of words changed, adding potential copyright infringement as another reason for deletion. --Darkbane 00:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Stoic atarian 06:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless there's a citation that can be provided to something discussing the phenomenon of the book's following as notable - which might merit entry change to something like 'Sigma Code conspiracy' or the like, I say delete. 11 May 2007 23:50 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.80.112.235 (talk) 06:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom. Utterly non-notable plus copyvio. andy 22:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.