Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigmomo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete (A7/G1) —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-24 11:32Z 

Sigmomo
Weak claims to notability; contested; obvious crap, but what else can I do? Rklawton 19:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Non-notable, vanity, some sort of joke non-sense and unencyclopedic--Nick Y. 20:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per nom. DrunkenSmurf 20:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, fails WP:Complete Bollocks. This is borderline patent nonsense. --Coredesat 21:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as a buzzkill. Fan1967 21:15, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Article has been marked with db-nonsense. --Coredesat 09:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.