Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signature Sound


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sound trademark.  Sandstein  09:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Signature Sound

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP. Two of the three references in the article are deadlinks while the third is to Discogs which isn't reliable to establish notability. There is a single source from Times of San Diego but it appears to be written by a local marketer and is only one local source, nothing that amounts to WP:CORPDEPTH. CNMall41 (talk) 04:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:13, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sound trademark. The entity is, as above, non-notable, but Signature Sound may very well be used by people trying to find out about the Signature Sound of an entity, and so a redirect is best here. --  No COBOL  (talk) 12:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.