Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signe Nordli (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Signe Nordli
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Poorly sourced biography of a living person. A one-time nude photoshoot is not, in my opinion, a very strong claim to notability. Reyk YO!  05:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 20:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is almost completely WP:OR about an unnotable individual. —  f c s u p e r ( How's That?, That's How! ) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) — 06:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. There doesn't seem to be that much to say about the subject based on what we can find in reliable independent sources. I can't find evidence that she decided to remain a model after her appearances in the Playboy "Starbucks" pictorial and DVD in 2003, or that she has otherwise tried to remain in the public eye since promoting those items when they were released seven years ago. Of course, this deletion should be without prejudice to a restoration if she is later found to be notable again. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. No coverage [cough cough] that I can find. When even many Playmates of the Month have lost their articles, it's clear that the standard is much higher than a one-off appearance. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.