Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SigniCASE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

SigniCASE

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No external references. Not obviously notable. Rathfelder (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:10, 10 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. -Zanhe (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is clearly an ad. ♣ ♦ SmartGuy ♥ ♠  (talk) 01:18, 11 June 2019 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmartGuy (talk • contribs)
 * Delete: The sole contribution from a WP:SPA was this primary-sourced article on an accessory provider firm. Searches show sporadic product mentions but no evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 06:10, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per above, article fails notability. Alex-h (talk) 13:00, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:PROMO and WP:GNG. It's just an ad. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:34, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.