Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signs of the Swarm (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 08:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Signs of the Swarm
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

A7 — non notable band. Still doesn't seem to stack up to the standards for notability despite this was already attempted before to get created before (and ended up getting deleted). Not much except for press from Unique Leader (a label who doesnt even have a article on the site) is mostly what comes up when googling the band's name. The only noteworthy thing about the group is that their music video for the first track on the second album gained a couple million views on YouTube's Slam Worldwide channel, but I still can't find evidence that either of their three albums ever even charted. Probably will never be notable in the future anyway because everyone is started to care a lot less for this band ever since their original vocalist left. Second Skin (talk) 08:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Here's the AfD from the first time it got deleted. Nothing has ever changed since in terms of notability since. Second Skin (talk) 08:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Maybe things will change when their upcoming album comes out, just sayin'....SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 10:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added several sources to this article and now believe it passes WP:GNG. The comment "Probably will never be notable in the future anyway because everyone is started to care a lot less for this band ever since their original vocalist left" seems silly considering they announced an upcoming album a month ago, so it is likely the band will receive more coverage in the future. NemesisAT (talk) 22:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment The previous deletion discussion had only one participant other than the nominator and was closed after two days. It certainly should not be used to establish consensus. NemesisAT (talk) 22:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as well as coverage in Dead Press, Decibel Magazine and Punk News added to the article they also have an AllMusic staff written bio here. All in all there is enough coverage for a pass of WP:GNG so deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep 10 references to relatively widely used metal publications should be more than enough to demonstrate notability.BuySomeApples (talk) 05:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.