Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Sikat

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No significant coverage that indicate the organization's notability. Moray An Par (talk) 12:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  —Moray An Par (talk) 12:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  —Moray An Par (talk) 12:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I had tagged the article for notability when I first encountered it, and left a note on the author's talk page with some suggestions. My feeling was that, since the Charity Commission of England and Wales lists this charity as raising under ₤10,000 per year, that it is probably not notable.  The author has provided no further citations to contradict that opinion, and as the nominator suggests, no sources can be found in a Google search either.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:15, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I concur with WikiDan61, no reliable sources found.-- SPhilbrick  T  13:23, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a single reference found   tashif   (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I find WikiDan61's points sound and agree entirely with them. Mouse Nightshirt | talk  18:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.