Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikh Presence In Los Angeles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Sikh Presence In Los Angeles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

90 percent of the references are to Wikipedia, while I'm sure interesting to the Sikh community I'm not seeing the applicability in a stand alone article notability or need for the presence in one particular city. This was not ready for article space, it was submitted to AFC declined and then passed by the author. I'd suggest a sandbox work if they think they can actually make this with reliable sourcing that shows notability. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 02:30, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I moved it into draft but this was moved back without addressing the issue with the sourcing of the article. A search did not reveal significant coverage - I can see articles on the vandalism of a Sikh temple and some passing mentions, but little else that would warrant an article such as this. There might be just enough material for Sikhs in California, but frankly I doubt one for Los Angeles alone is ever warranted. Fails WP:GNG. Hzh (talk) 12:51, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is more like an essay than an article. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Draftify. I commend Hzh for trying to save it previously. Let's give the editor another chance to reliably source it and perhaps take Hzh's advice to broaden the scope. Ifnord (talk) 12:10, 24 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.