Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silent Voices (2005 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 11:48, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Silent Voices (2005 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another non-notable film article from the promoters of Paul Atherton HouseOfChange (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. HouseOfChange (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Week keep as this one did receive some reliable sources coverage such as a review in Empire Magazine, DVD monthly magazine and some related coverage in The Big Issue, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as per reasons cited by Atlantic306 Itsallnewtome (talk) 20:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Still sufficient disagreement to show a clear consensus
 * Comment A few capsule reviews do not constitute "significant coverage" as required by WP:GNG. Wikipedia policy on notability for films has clear and specific criteria, as for example (from NFO) "full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics" or "at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release." Wikipedia notability is a high bar, this film doesn't reach it. HouseOfChange (talk) 22:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable with enough coverage. WP:NFO is being misused because it doesn't state that is what a film article must have. That section of the film notability guideline is titled "Other evidence of notability", meaning that the section is only for if a film article doesn't meet the general notability guideline. SL93 (talk) 02:41, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The empire review is the only decent bit of coverage about the film. One slightly good piece is not enough. Passing mentions and a capsule review fall well short. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:46, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 09:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.