Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Silion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:N Richard C. Stone (talk) 05:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete Per WP:N and nom Clubjustin3 (talk) 05:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete Its content is incorrect anyway. It is effectively an orphan, because "What links here" shows an earlier incarnation when it was some sort of Indian village.-- Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Mon 13:35, wikitime=  05:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment This AfD was started by a vandal who mass-nominated dozens of articles for deletion, seemingly at random. Since this one has generated other delete !votes, I'm going to leave it open; I have no opinion on the notability of the article. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 06:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep as per WP:NGEO and WP:GAZ.--RioHondo (talk) 12:05, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 10:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Obvious keep per WP:GEOLAND. It's an officially recognized, populated barangay, as demonstrated by the very first reference in the article (the Philippine Statistics Authority) and by various other authoritative sources, e.g. [. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] (talk) 11:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND and now sourced. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.